Most technology decisions are made on features and price. This post suggests adding a third criterion: values alignment. Not every tool with good features deserves your business—and not every affordable option is a wise choice.
The Values Checklist
Before adding any tool to your stack, evaluate it against these principles:
Privacy Respect
- Does the tool collect only the data it needs to function?
- Can you opt out of data collection that isn't essential to the service?
- Is the privacy policy clear, concise, and honest?
- Does the tool offer data processing agreements for business use?
Data Portability
- Can you export all your data in standard formats?
- Does the tool provide API access for programmatic data retrieval?
- Can you migrate to a competitor without losing your work?
Transparency
- Is the tool's pricing model clear and predictable?
- Does the company communicate changes honestly and with adequate notice?
- Is there visibility into how the tool uses your data?
Openness
- Does the tool use open standards and formats?
- Does it integrate with other tools via standard protocols?
- Is there an open-source alternative that serves the same purpose?
Sustainability
- Is the company's business model sustainable (not dependent on venture capital that may run out)?
- Has the company demonstrated long-term commitment to its current product direction?
- Are there concerning signs of potential acquisition, pivot, or shutdown?
The Practical Trade-Off
A values-aligned stack may sacrifice some convenience, features, or polish. This is acceptable because the alternative—building your business on a foundation that violates your principles—creates long-term risks that outweigh short-term benefits.
The trade-off framework:
- Non-negotiable: Privacy respect and data portability (these protect your business)
- Strongly preferred: Transparency and openness (these reduce risk)
- Nice to have: Complete open-source purity (this is aspirational; pragmatism is acceptable)
The Recommended Stack
| Need | Values-Aligned Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Notes | Obsidian | Local files, no data collection, full portability |
| AI (sensitive) | Ollama + open models | Local processing, full privacy |
| AI (general) | Google AI Studio (paid) | Clear terms, API access, data protections |
| Automation | n8n (self-hosted) | Full control, open source |
| Website | Astro/Next.js on Vercel | Code ownership, standard formats |
| Your domain + portable list | Audience ownership | |
| Design | Canva (paid) | Full export, API access |
| Project Management | Notion | Full API, data export, clear terms |
The Ongoing Practice
Values-aligned technology selection is not a one-time decision. It's an ongoing practice:
- Review your stack quarterly for changes in providers' terms or behaviour
- Monitor news about your tool providers for concerning developments
- Be willing to migrate when a tool's values alignment deteriorates
- Support the open-source projects and companies that align with your principles
